2. Eating At the Table of the Lord

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16)

What does the Apostle Paul mean by the “communion of the blood and body of Christ”?

“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons” (1 Corinthians 10:21).

In Chapter 10 of the first epistle to the Corinthian church, the Apostle Paul illuminates and puts in context his reference to our communion in partaking of the memorial emblems of the cup and bread.

What Pastor Charles Russell Taught

Pastor Charles Russell quoted 1 Corinthians 10:2 in The Reprints of the Original Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Presence and taught that there was a secondary meaning to the bread and wine emblems: that the (1) “broken loaf” represents the breaking of all his mystical members” and “communion of the blood of Christ” means a “participation in the sufferings and death of Jesus.” R3364.

He based this teaching of a secondary meaning on the word “communion” in Corinthians 10:2 and that since the word “communion” comes from the ancient Greek word koinonia; which in its basic sense means a common union with someone in a shared experience, he thought that the shared experience is “the sufferings and death” and that the common union was with Jesus.

Let us now consider the 1 Corinthian Chapter 10 context, in order to understand the Apostle Paul’s teachings in this section, and thereby specifically examine whether this proposed secondary meaning is actually what the Apostle Paul was teaching or not.

The Context:

i) The Immediate Context: 1 Corinthians 10:1-22

The verses that define the immediate context for understanding the communion verse [16] are found in 1 Corinthians 10:1-22.

Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea” (1 Corinthians 10:1, NKJV).

δέ de; a primitive word; but, and, now

We notice that verse 1 uses the conjunction δέ, meaning but, and, now here, the NKJV translates δέ as “moreover.” This tells us that this section is also linked to what came before and therefore that there is a wider context to consider also.

ii) The Wider Context: It is Possible to Lose the Imperishable Crown

“… I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some” (1 Corinthians 9:22).

In the previous few Chapters in 1 Corinthians, the Apostle Paul outlines his determination to put nothing in the way of the Gospel and to be “all things to all men” in order to “save some.”

“And everyone who competes for the prize is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a perishable crown, but we for an imperishable crown. 26 Therefore I run thus: not with uncertainty. Thus I fight: not as one who beats the air. 27 But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified(1 Corinthians 9:25–27).

The paragraph immediately prior to Chapter 10, the Apostle Paul outlines the possibility that it is possible to be disqualified from gaining the imperishable crown if we do not run in the race with temperance and discipline, and therefore we can expect that what follows will be practical advice and warnings, as well as bringing to mind relevant aspects of our faith to give us strength and determination in order to gain the prize of that imperishable crown.

iii) The Immediate Context: Warnings Against the Conscious Pursuit of Evil Things

“Now these things became our examples, to the intent that we should not lust after evil things as they also lusted” (1 Corinthians 10:6).

The immediate context to the communion verse is that of the Apostle Paul’s warnings against the conscious pursuit of evil things because the end result of doing so is the loss of God’s favour and disqualification from the race for the prize of the high calling in Christ Jesus.

“No temptation has overtaken you except such as is common to man; but God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will also make the way of escape, that you may be able to bear it” (1 Corinthians 10:13).

The Apostle Paul outlines that even though God will give us the means to escape these temptations, we have an important role in the matter; actively and consciously exercising temperance and discipline.

iii) The Apostle Uses Two Devices in His Warnings:

The Apostle Paul uses two didactic devices to highlight the danger and seriousness of consciously pursuing temptations: firstly, he uses the example of natural Israel during their wanderings in the desert; and secondly, he reminds us of the underlying meaning and significance of partaking of the cup and the bread at the memorial.

The Apostle Paul’s points and logic here have the purpose of ensuring that his fellow Christians are not disqualified from gaining the prize by pursuing evil things.

The Example of “Israel after the Flesh”

“Observe Israel after the flesh: Are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?” (1 Corinthians 10:18).

“Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come” (1 Corinthians 10:11).

Here the Apostle Paul uses the experiences in the wilderness of natural Israel as a type to illustrate important lessons for spiritual Israel.

1) Idolatry,

2) Sexual immorality,

3) Testing of the Lord, and

4) Murmuring or complaining

The Apostle Paul specifically mentions four evil things “Israel after the flesh” engaged in:  idolatry, sexual immorality, testing of the Lord, and murmuring or complaining

“But with most of them God was not well pleased, for their bodies were scattered in the wilderness” (1 Corinthians 10:5).

Because of this, God was not pleased with them and their bodies He scattered in the wilderness. By outlining these experiences as examples for our instruction, Paul is warning that we face the same dangers – particularly if we become complacent; as he points out in 1 Corinthians 10:12 Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall.”

In the Apostle Paul’s references to “Israel after the flesh” here, he introduces the concept of natural Israel partaking of spiritual nourishment in the wilderness from God by way of our Lord Jesus Christ- for they all “drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:3-4).

“Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat’” (John 6:31).

“Then Moses lifted his hand and struck the rock twice with his rod; and water came out abundantly, and the congregation and their animals drank” (Numbers 20:11).

God miraculously provided Israel with literal food and drink during their desert wanderings, but this is not what Paul is focusing on here. He is referring to spiritual food and drink.

The miraculous manna given to natural Israel was, of course, a great blessing but as Deuteronomy 8:3 tells us, it was intended to teach them the lesson that man lives – in the greater sense, by feeding on “every word that proceeds from the mouth of the Lord” – this is the real spiritual food. The word of God was imparted to them through Moses, so that they were guided and protected by God in their wanderings. God spoke to them through their covenant relationship, and through the many wonderful promises given to them, as well as their miraculous liberation from Egypt.

“They all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink…”(1 Corinthians 10: 3–4).

In this way, Israel after the flesh ate at the Lord’s table, for they all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink.

The Apostle Paul makes clear that it was all of natural Israel that ate at the Lord’s table and he mentions the all twice, probably to make this abundantly clear.

Crucially, we see that the benefits of the spiritual drink and the spiritual food flows from our Lord Jesus to all of the Israelites. It is clear that Jesus did not eat or drink this spiritual food or drink.

In summary: a commonality was established amongst the individual Israelites through all partaking of the same spiritual food and drink – the source of which was our Lord Jesus.

Paul is laying the ground work in his lead up to the important lesson that like Israel after the flesh, Israel after the spirit also eats and drinks at the table of the Lord – gaining far greater blessings but at the same time conferring important responsibilities.

All of Fleshly Israel Partakes, All of Spiritual Israel Partakes

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16)

In 1 Corinthians 10:16 the Apostle Paul reminds his fellow Christians that the literal partaking of the cup and bread is not a meaningless ritual. Rather, by partaking of the cup emblem we show that we are spiritually feeding on the blood of Jesus by gaining justification through faith. Also, by partaking of the bread emblem, we show that we are being spiritually nourished by appropriating the benefits of Jesus’ sacrificed body.

What Does Partaking of the Emblems (the cup and the bread) Show?

It shows that we are eating/drinking at the Table of the Lord with fellow believers; the communion, leading to eternal life.

“Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day” (John 6:54).

i) Partaking of the Cup [drinking of the blood of Jesus] shows:

1) The New Covenant is Ratified and Operative for the Church by the Blood of Jesus, enabling:

– Learning of God

– Having God’s law written on our hearts

2) Believers have True Forgiveness of sins by faith through application of the blood of Jesus as the antitypical sin-offering under the administration of the better sacrifices

3) Believers are Reconciled to God [achieving atonement with God – from1)+2)]

4) Have Received The Promise of the holy spirit

5) Believers are Cleansed from ongoing inadvertent sin [purification through the antitypical ashes of the red heifer – depicted in Jesus washing of the disciples’ feet]

ii) Partaking of the Bread [eating of the flesh of Jesus] shows:

1) Believers Receive and Understand Jesus’ words of truth [through the holy spirit]

2) Have ongoing spiritual nutrition for spiritual growth of the new creature through the indwelling of the holy spirit given at baptism into Christ

– Growing in grace and knowledge

– Learning of God

– Having God’s law written on our hearts

“Then Jesus said to them, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you’” (John 6:53).

All of Jesus’ followers must eat his flesh and drink his blood.

The spiritual drink and spiritual food that we partake of leads to eternal life which is provided for us by the sacrifice of Jesus, by the grace of God.

** We notice in John 6:53 that Jesus is addressing his followers – unless you eat and drink, you have no life in you – plainly Jesus is not including himself here.

1 Corinthians 10:3–4 (NKJV) — all ate the same spiritual food, 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.”

We notice again that the same relationship exists in spiritual Israel as it did in fleshly Israel. All the natural Israelites ate the spiritual food and drank the spiritual drink. There is no suggestion that Jesus somehow also ate and drank of the same spiritual food and drink as fleshly Israel.

“Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you” (Matthew 26:27).

Jesus did not say “let us all drink of it”, rather he said “drink from it, all of you.

Also, Jesus’ instructions were to do this “in remembrance of me not in remembrance of us.

“He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who feeds on Me will live because of Me. 58 This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever (John 6:56–58).

Israel after the flesh ate the manna, died

Spiritual Israel eat/drink of Jesus flesh/blood, live forever

Note how this parallels the type which emphasises its importance in understanding the communion relationship. The Apostle John, in John 6:58, beautifully links the type and the antitype for us: “This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever.”

“This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins (Matthew 26:28).

“In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you’” (Luke 22:20).

Jesus’ blood, through which we have forgiveness of sins, was poured out for us — that is for spiritual Israel. It is clear that Jesus could not eat of his flesh or drink his own blood as he was sinless and undefiled and hence did not require forgiveness. Moreover, if he had any sin, he would not have been able to provide life through his sacrifice. This shows the flow of the blessings of forgiveness of sins, from Jesus by virtue of his sacrificed flesh and poured out blood, is to us.

There is no indication that those feeding and drinking are contributing to the food and drink.

Sacrificial Nourishment for the Levites/Firstborn

“The priests, the Levites—all the tribe of Levi—shall have no part nor inheritance with Israel; they shall eat the offerings of the Lord made by fire, and His portion” (Deuteronomy 18:1).

Observe Israel after the flesh: Are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?”  (1 Corinthians 10:18).

The Apostle Paul then goes even further, and makes the illustration from the type even more specific in order to further illuminate the communion relationship and the significance of our partaking of the cup and bread memorial emblems. He does this by referring to the priests and Levites that did partake of the sacrifices from the altar in the tabernacle. The tribe of Levi had no inheritance in the Land of Israel and so they lived off the offerings made to the Lord. The offerings from the altar in the tabernacle were therefore their source of food.

This illustration is more specific to Christians and is introduced immediately after the communion verses to make clear the significance and nature of the communion relationship and he links the two situations by the word “observe.”

In the tabernacle picture, as with the firstborn of the Passover, the tribe of Levi represented the household of faith — which only has a heavenly inheritance. The tribe of Levi had no land of their own, picturing this heavenly inheritance of the Church of firstborns.

The priests and Levites ate of the sacrifices, indicating that they internalised the nutritional benefits to themselves. Again, there is no suggestion here that by eating of these sacrifices they were sharing in or contributing to the actual sacrifice. Rather, the benefit of the nutritional elements flowed in one direction and one direction only — from the altar to the priest or Levite. In the antitype this translates directly to the flow of spiritual benefits from the altar of God by way of Jesus’ sacrifice to the household of faith, which the Priests and Levites represented.

In this more specific typical picture, the Apostle Paul introduces the important principle that the altar from which the sacrificed food comes, identifies the source of the food. The priests and Levites ate of the sacrifices from the altar in the court of the tabernacle, thus identifying the source of the food as God.

Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to wise men; judge for yourselves what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:14–17).

The communion verses come immediately after the Apostle Paul’s admonition to flee from idolatry; which was a particular problem in the Corinthian church. The Corinthian church consisted of many Christians of Gentile background and these brethren were accustomed to eating food from the markets and in houses of unbelievers that had been sacrificed on pagan altars to pagan gods. The Apostle Paul’s aim here is to illustrate the dangers of continuing to eat these pagan sacrifices by pointing out the crucial significance of the altar from which the sacrifices come. Here he is teaching that those that partake of these sacrifices in the type, are commonly joined to one another by participating of the altar and what it represents, from which the sacrifice comes. In the same way, those that eat of pagan sacrifices are commonly joined by participating in eating from them.  

Partaking of pagan sacrifices means partaking of the table of demons.

“What am I saying then? That an idol is anything, or what is offered to idols is anything? 20 Rather, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to demons and not to God, and I do not want you to have fellowship with demons” (1 Corinthians 10:19–20).

Even though, as the Apostle Paul points out, idols are nothing in themselves, in reality the altar is demonic, so that by partaking of the pagan sacrifice, one is not only joining oneself in fellowship with those pagans that eat the sacrificed food, but is also partaking of the table of demons.

“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons” (1 Corinthians 10:21).

And for a Christian to partake of the table of the Lord is incompatible with partaking of the table of demons.

Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than He?” (1 Corinthians 10:22).

By partaking of these pagan sacrifices, Christians risk provoking the Lord to jealousy.

“You shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, …” (Exodus 20:5).

For our God is a jealous God and He will not tolerate other gods, for all other gods are no gods. So that the worship of anything but God is not only false but is also of Satan — for he is the great usurper, for he wanted to be as the Most High. Worship of anything else but God usurps the authority of God and displaces the true worship reserved only for God.

And this principle is embodied in the first and greatest commandment – “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind” (Matthew 22:37).

So, to summarize, it is evident that the food provided at these altars is not shared in the sense of being contributed to by the partaker. The flow of nutrition, whether typical or spiritual or idolatrous, flows from the altar to the recipient, for the benefit (or detriment) of the partaker.

The modern-day gods that we are in danger of worshipping tend to be more subtle and insidious.

“For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: 19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame— who set their mind on earthly things. 20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ…” (Philippians 3:18–20).

In our modern society we find people pursuing such things as knowledge, health, physical beauty, money, material things, status and respect. Even though most of these have benefits in moderation, when one is consumed by their pursuit it becomes a false god. Therefore, anything that takes our minds and desires from the heavenly things, anything that supplants the true and appropriate worship of our heavenly Father is a false god and amounts to idolatry when pursued to an excessive extent.

A particular danger for the household of faith is the supplanting, consciously or subconsciously, of the authority of the word of God with the words of any imperfect human being. Our faith must be based on the word of God, not on the words of a man. All teachings must be tested thoroughly against scripture.

KOINONIA

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion (koinonia) of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion (koinonia) of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16).

Koinonia is part of the koin- root word group which has the fundamental meaning of sharing in something (indicated by the genitive case) with someone (indicated by the dative case); or the simple cases may be replaced by a prepositional phrase.

“By which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers (koin-) of the divine nature (genitive case), having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust” (2 Peter 1:4).

“Therefore, if there is any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship  (koin-) of the Spirit (genitive case), if any affection and mercy…” (Philippians 2:1).

Another example of the koin- root word group occurs in Philippians 2 verse 1. Paul is talking about the fellowship of the holy spirit – it is evident that each individual of the household of faith has a share in the holy spirit with all other believers. Spirit is in the genitive case indicating what they commonly share in. Importantly the sharing is in the holy spirit not with the holy spirit.

“And so also were James and John, the sons of Zebedee, who were partners (koin-) with Simon (dative case). And Jesus said to Simon, ‘Do not be afraid. From now on you will catch men.’” (Luke 5:10).

So, the word “koinonia” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 means that the household of faith share-the shared experience, in the drinking of the blood of Jesus and eating of his flesh with one another.

In our 1 Corinthians 10:14–22 context, we have the koin- root word used four times.

If drinking of the cup of the Lord meant sharing in the sufferings of the Lord, then those drinking of the cup of demons would have to mean sharing in the sufferings of demons — which evidently is not the case.

Here the Apostle Paul also uses the koin- root word with respect to the Levites being common sharers of the brazen altar and what it represents. Altar here is in the genitive case making clear what the Levites are participating in. It is clear from the actual type and the underlying grammar that the meaning of the koin- root word here does not mean a sharing with the altar and the sacrifices that come from it. The Levites did not contribute to the sacrifices or their suffering in any way — they ate of them and thereby benefitted from them.

By eating of the bread, and drinking of the cup introduced by Jesus at the memorial, we show that we are commonly – with one another, sharing in the eating of the flesh of Jesus and drinking of his blood. Thereby we receive the spiritual nutrition essential and indispensable for our salvation.

Although sharing in the sufferings and death of Jesus is clearly taught in the scriptures, Paul is not teaching this here in the communion verse.

“Is it Not”: Indicates a Reminder of Something Already Taught Not Something New

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:16–17).

That the Apostle Paul is bringing to mind something familiar rather than a new teaching [like a secondary meaning] is indicated by his use of the phrase “is it not”, twice in the communion verses.

Technically, “is it not” is a figure of speech referred to as “interrogation”; this occurs when a question is asked without waiting for the answer. There are different forms of interrogation and here it is called “interrogation in negative affirmation“; this occurs when the question is put in the negative, and the answer must be in the affirmative, and very emphatically so – indicating that the point made is or should be known already by those to whom the question is addressed.

Let us look at other instances of use of this figure of speech.

“Therefore, I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing?” (Matthew 6:25).

We find it is used in Matthew 6:25 by Jesus to show that indeed life is more than food and the body more than clothing. The important point to glean here is that the “is not” did not introduce something they did not already know.

“So all bore witness to Him, and marveled at the gracious words which proceeded out of His mouth. And they said, ‘Is this not Joseph’s son?’” (Luke 4:22)

We find another example of this interrogative figure of speech in Luke 4 verse 22.  Because of the gracious words that proceeded out of Jesus’ mouth, the people assumed that he was a sage from a far-off land with new found wisdom, and yet the interrogation in negative affirmation “is not” emphasises the fact that Jesus and his family were well known to them.

Therefore, the use of this “is not” figure of speech suggests that the communion verses are a reminder or an emphasis of something that was clear and known, rather than introducing a new truth.

Partaking of the Memorial Emblems Shows That We are Eating and Drinking at the Table of the Lord.

The memorial truth that the Apostle Paul is reminding us of is that eating of the bread and the drinking of the cup emblems indicates that we are together figuratively partaking of the sacrificed body and shed blood of Jesus – and thereby we are eating and drinking at the table of the Lord.

Sharing in the Sufferings of Jesus an Important Teaching – But Not Shown in Partaking of the Memorial Emblems

Let us be clear that we are not saying that faithful followers of Jesus do not share in his sufferings and death – for this is taught clearly in the word of God. Philippians 3:10 is a case in point:

“that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death…” (Philippians 3:10).

But this is not Paul’s teaching in his reference to our partaking of the memorial emblems in 1 Corinthians 10:16.

Fixing KJV 1 Corinthians 10:17

The Rendering of 1 Corinthians 10:17 in the KJV, NKJV and even the RVIC2016 is faulty.

“For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:17, NKJV).

 104 seeing that we the many are one bread, one body: for we all partake.” (1 Corinthians 10:17, (RVIC2016).

When we read 1 Corinthians 10:17 in the KJV, NKJV and even the RVIC2016, we are left with the thought that by partaking of the bread emblem the followers of Jesus become that bread. Ostensibly this does not seem to make sense, but does seem to give credence to the thought that the Church becomes part of the sacrifice from which it benefits.

1 Corinthians 10:17 should read – seeing that there is one bread, we, who are many, are one body”

The Church is referred to as “one body” but never as “the/one bread.” Only Jesus is referred to as “the bread.”

The more modern translations, including the Diaglott, show that the greater number of modern translators overwhelmingly favour the alternate rendering – seeing that there is one bread, we, who are many, are one body. The“we” belongs with the many and one body, not the bread – for as the verse makes clear we are one body because we partake of that bread.

We Need to Keep Eating at the Table of the Lord in Order to Gain the Imperishable Crown

As followers of Jesus, we need to keep spiritually feeding on his flesh and drink his blood to continue to receive these incredibly gracious benefits during this age of darkness. We remind ourselves of these spiritual benefits flowing from God to us based on Jesus’ shed blood and sacrificed body, particularly at memorial time.

What a privilege it is to eat and drink at the table of the Lord; for it leads to eternal life. But doing so also carries all important responsibilities. We have to avoid all forms of idolatry, particularly the subtle forms, for truly we are on trial for life, now.

“Now the just shall live by faith; But if anyone draws back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” 39 But we are not of those who draw back to perdition, but of those who believe to the saving of the soul(Hebrews 10:38–39).

But if we are careful and listen to God’s word, for Jesus speaks to us through it, we will not be of those that draw back to destruction, but rather we will be of those that are faithful, temperate and disciplined, leading to eternal life – to the glory of our Heavenly Father.

“Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: Thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over” (Psalm 23:5).

Amen.

Doing and Saying the Kindest Thing in the Kindest Way

1 PETER 3, 9 - DOING & SAYING THE KINDEST THING IN THE KINDEST WAY

What is the SPIRIT OF HELPFULNESS all about?

“Let every one of us please his neighbour for his good to edification(Romans 15:2).

In Romans 15:2, the Apostle Paul is not saying, let the younger ones please their neighbour, nor does he say, let the older ones please their neighbour; but he says,

 “Let EVERY ONE of us please his neighbour.”  

All of the Lord’s people should have such an interest in one another and in the Lord’s cause, and should have so much of the spirit of the Master, that they would seek rather to sacrifice themselves than to gratify self, especially at the expense of others.

If we have the spirit of Christ, we shall find various ways in which we will sacrifice self without waiting for specific directions.

The Law of Love will incite us to act contrary to our own natural preferences, if by so doing we shall help one another in the good way.

In his letter to the Corinthian Church the apostle illustrates this principle by a practical application regarding the Greek custom of offering their meat in their temples. After having been thus offered to the idols, the meat was considered to be especially sacred. Nearly all of the meat available was offered to idols, so that whenever one wished to have meat he could find none that had not been thus offered.

Those who had come out of idolatry into Christianity, knew that the worship of idols was wrong; for they had learned that there is only the one true God.

The apostle declares that he would abstain altogether from eating meat rather than risk stumbling a brother who could not take the broader, truer view. To stumble such a one, might be to throw him out of the right way entirely.

Responsibility For Our Influence

The apostle Paul did not say that it is not right to eat meat; but rather, that he was willing to forego his rights and privileges in order to edify another.

These others of whom the apostle Paul had spoke had not come to appreciate fully the fact that meat offered to idols had not suffered any ill effect or been changed in any way from having had this done. To set meat before a piece of stone would not injure it; and so to set it before an idol would not cause it any ill effects.

But Paul so self-sacrificially, preferred to give up eating meat altogether rather than to stumble any brother or sister in Christ.

What a glorious lesson for us dear friends!

Let us ask our self the follow questions:

When necessary, do I willing deny myself some of my privileges and rights in striving to be of any assistance to my brethren in Christ and in avoiding to stumble them?

Some of the Lord’s people have very sensitive consciences, others are less sensitive.

The longer one has been in the “School of Christ” and/or the more ability one may have, the more easily should one be able to discern what would be pleasing to the Lord we would hope based on each individual’s uniquely permitted experiences, of course that only the Heavenly Father and His son Jesus perfectly understand best, as they are Divine beings.

As a Christian, one would not want to do anything to offend the Lord, even if he were to go without meat for the remainder of his life.

Another introspective question for Christ-like development may be perhaps this one:

Would I, even if it be for the remainder of this carnal life, prefer to deny myself of something (that of course would not harm the New Creation of Christ within self,) that would be for the best interests of another beloved one in Christ so as not to stumble a weaker one in faith or one who may have their conscience violated by doing so?

This involves walking and talking with the Heavenly Father moment to moment to discern God’s will—who mercifully gives wisdom and provides us with His answers to all who ask, seek, and knock to Jehovah for help (Matthew 7:7).

These may be very personal items of decision-making here under consideration, yet how reassured we are through the words of the Prophet Isaiah,

“And your ears shall hear a word behind you, saying, ‘This is the way, walk in it,’ when you turn to the right or when you turn to the left” (Isaiah 30:21).

The Heavenly Father makes clear one’s path through an exercised conscience—that is, a conscience that is disciplined and trained in seeking after that which is righteous in the eyes of the divine perfect God of the universe (Matthew 5:6).

Another introspective question for Christ-like development may be:

Would I wish to lose all my influence for the good of my fellow brother and sister in Christ?

The apostle answers this suggestion in the negative; he says, “…(12) when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ. (13) Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend” (1 Corinthians 8:1-13).

Let us consider some practical “life” scenarios.

Example 1: Regarding clothing…

Perhaps you attend an ecclesia where consecrated sisters in Christ wear head coverings and believe that dressing modestly means to wear skirts and dresses below the knee and which cover the shoulders and not to wear pants (considering that to be a traditional male item of clothing and relying on the words of 1 Corinthians 11:4-16 and Deuteronomy 22:5 for their convictions of belief). After examining the Scriptures on these topics one may realize that wearing a head covering and wearing a modest dress or skirt does not seem in any way to violate the laws of God, and hence will see no reason why not to do so, in order to help create peace around and least offend in any way any dear member in the ecclesia attended. Yet if this does cause contention then considering it a suffering for Christ, may each be humbled—recognizing even more, one’s own ignorance or errors of self for as the words of Philippians 2:3 teach us:

“Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.”

As the apostle Paul stated best in regards to the above issue about clothing or hair apparel:

“But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God” (1 Corinthians 11:16).

Probably the NAS Bible gives the sense better, “But if one is inclined to be contentious, we have no other practice, nor have the churches of God.”

Example 2: Our words or actions…

Perhaps at a testimony meeting in your ecclesia, one would share something that they believe would be of great edification to all, yet something in one’s conduct or words has caused offense in another—perhaps due to language or cultural barriers or perhaps a result of another mis-hearing correctly yet the results of each one’s intentions and conduct involved in such a situation shall be best understood and credited to each involved by the Heavenly Father who sees each heart and each motive. Again, we are ALL ignorant each moment of each day no matter how great or small the issue at hand—which depends on one’s closeness with the Heavenly Father—and thus, how in tune to the Father’s will each dear child of God is to be, being reassured that God through Christ, shall “reward each according to what they have done” (Romans 2:6).

“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad” (2 Corinthians 5:10).

“Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing” (1 Peter 3:9).

Would one not rather suffer any unkind effects towards us from our words or actions in having done what an educated conscience before the Father believes was done seeking towards righteousness rather than suffering the outcomes of results and the self-inflicted cross of guilt for knowing we had not done how Christ Jesus our Head, would wish us to?

Example 3: Sunday observance…

Applying the above principle—our responsibility for our influence—to Sunday observance, we are not to feel a bondage under the Old Law, during the Sabbath day. However we should avoid what would be considered by others as not observing the Sabbath.

To our understanding EVERY day is a part of the great Sabbath into which we have entered—rest in Christ.

We have a greater liberty. But we are not to use this liberty to the injury of others.

Many people think that any kind of labor is a violation of the Fourth Commandment.

From our viewpoint we know that the Sabbath of the Jew was typical; and we see what the antitype is. We are enjoying the antitype of that Sabbath.

But while we might have liberty to work on Sunday, our so doing might stumble our neighbour. We would not be violating any principle in not observing Sunday; but for the sake of not stumbling our neighbour we are glad to rest from our work and to give ourselves to the study of God’s Word.

Sunday should be a day that is quiet and reverential in every way, and devoted specially to the service of God—a day in which business is restricted, and as far as possible eliminated. But for the interests of the Lord’s work to forbid refraining from the use of today’s transportation blessings such as cars or trains and trams on Sunday would not apply to today’s world as once it may have been the case. Each place… each time period… each culture… each community even… have certain ways of functioning and by best striving to not offend anyone, but with gentleness of mind and being lowly of heart as Christ was, let us strive to represent Christ as best we can now, knowing that where we fall short after doing our best, Christ’s robe of righteousness covers all the failures that surround us.

Sabbath signifies rest, as the Apostle used it (Hebrews 4:9, margin), we can see that the Church of Christ keeps the Sabbath, or rest, every day, and recognizes God’s arrangement in connection with this matter. Those who keep every seventh day as a Sabbath, but who fail to enter into and keep the rest of faith, are not keeping the true Sabbath, but keeping another, so far as the Church is concerned.

The Sabbath arrangement was for the Jews. We have the better arrangement under our Covenant.

We enter into rest, our Sabbath, EVERY day; and we are hoping that soon we will enter into the still Greater Sabbath.

In that Sabbath, the Millennium, we shall have not only rest of heart, but also perfection, no longer to be challenged by trials and difficulties of life.

During His ministry Jesus chose the Sabbath day in which to perform miracles and heal the sick, that He might show forth the kind of works which He will perform during the Great Sabbath Day, the seventh-thousand-year day—the Millennium.

Helping, Not Hindering Our Neighbours

We can apply this principle in a general way. We can apply it to our conversation with Christian people.

There is a way of taunting people on their ignorance, etc. This is not love.

LOVE does not delight to expose another’s weaknesses.

The more careful we become in our words and our actions, the more polite we shall be, the more helpful.

Politeness is :

to do and say the kindest thing in the kindest way.

One may be polite for the sake of policy or for the sake of principle.

E.g. You have a business and you are polite to your clients or else you will not have any to buy from you, and in turn, no income to live from.

Our pleasing of our neighbours should be for their edification.

We should be glad to do ALL that we can for their assistance, their edification, their uplift, their upbuilding.

If we can speak a pleasant word, a kind word, it would be for upbuilding and have in mind primarily the upbuilding of the Lord’s people in spiritual things. As the apostle Paul says, we are “to provoke one another.”

In the ISV translation Hebrews 10:24 reads:

And let us continue to consider how to MOTIVATE one another
to love and good deeds…

What the apostle had in mind here was the reverse of provoking to anger, hatred and strife.

Brother Charles Russell comments in Reprints of the Original Watchtower (R.5413):

 “Some of the dear brethren who are evidently very sincere have not caught the spirit of the Truth on this subject; and wherever they go, they are apt to stir up the evil mind of others, instead of stirring up their good mind and provoking to love and good works.”

We are to please our neighbors so far as it would be for their good, and according to right principles. But to upbuild one in injustice would not be right.

Now here are our final questions to put theory into practice:

For our Australian friends: Would we think it right to let our neighbour’s emus run all over our front driveway?

emus.jpg

For our local and international friends: Would we think it right to let our neighbour’s dogs run all over our front lawn?

6a00d83451c9f669e20167678794a1970b-400wi

Take a moment or two to think of what you would do.

We believe here is a most lovingly wise, compassionate and merciful response to such a question … (but in regards to chickens) by Pastor Charles Russell:

“We think that he [his neighbor] would thus be more edified by our firm stand for right. But we must not tell him how to manage his chickens. We must do our best to keep his chickens off our place; but we would make a mistake if we were to go in and order our neighbor’s chickens, house and children.  To do so would be busybodying. We shall have enough to do to look after the weaknesses of our own family.”

Further Reading:

Bible verses for consideration:

Is the Sabbath Day a Saturday, Sunday, or any day of the Week?
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2017/10/19/is-the-sabbath-day-a-saturday-sunday-or-any-day-of-the-week/

Acknowledgment & Reference:

Br Charles Russell—R.5413. Reprints of the Original Watch Tower & Herald of Christ’s Presence.

The URL of this post:
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2017/03/18/doing-and-saying-the-kindest-thing-in-the-kindest-way/

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

Save

Save