2. Eating At the Table of the Lord

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16)

What does the Apostle Paul mean by the “communion of the blood and body of Christ”?

“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons” (1 Corinthians 10:21).

In Chapter 10 of the first epistle to the Corinthian church, the Apostle Paul illuminates and puts in context his reference to our communion in partaking of the memorial emblems of the cup and bread.

What Pastor Charles Russell Taught

Pastor Charles Russell quoted 1 Corinthians 10:2 in The Reprints of the Original Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Presence and taught that there was a secondary meaning to the bread and wine emblems: that the (1) “broken loaf” represents the breaking of all his mystical members” and “communion of the blood of Christ” means a “participation in the sufferings and death of Jesus.” R3364.

He based this teaching of a secondary meaning on the word “communion” in Corinthians 10:2 and that since the word “communion” comes from the ancient Greek word koinonia; which in its basic sense means a common union with someone in a shared experience, he thought that the shared experience is “the sufferings and death” and that the common union was with Jesus.

Let us now consider the 1 Corinthian Chapter 10 context, in order to understand the Apostle Paul’s teachings in this section, and thereby specifically examine whether this proposed secondary meaning is actually what the Apostle Paul was teaching or not.

The Context:

i) The Immediate Context: 1 Corinthians 10:1-22

The verses that define the immediate context for understanding the communion verse [16] are found in 1 Corinthians 10:1-22.

Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea” (1 Corinthians 10:1, NKJV).

δέ de; a primitive word; but, and, now

We notice that verse 1 uses the conjunction δέ, meaning but, and, now here, the NKJV translates δέ as “moreover.” This tells us that this section is also linked to what came before and therefore that there is a wider context to consider also.

ii) The Wider Context: It is Possible to Lose the Imperishable Crown

“… I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some” (1 Corinthians 9:22).

In the previous few Chapters in 1 Corinthians, the Apostle Paul outlines his determination to put nothing in the way of the Gospel and to be “all things to all men” in order to “save some.”

“And everyone who competes for the prize is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a perishable crown, but we for an imperishable crown. 26 Therefore I run thus: not with uncertainty. Thus I fight: not as one who beats the air. 27 But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified(1 Corinthians 9:25–27).

The paragraph immediately prior to Chapter 10, the Apostle Paul outlines the possibility that it is possible to be disqualified from gaining the imperishable crown if we do not run in the race with temperance and discipline, and therefore we can expect that what follows will be practical advice and warnings, as well as bringing to mind relevant aspects of our faith to give us strength and determination in order to gain the prize of that imperishable crown.

iii) The Immediate Context: Warnings Against the Conscious Pursuit of Evil Things

“Now these things became our examples, to the intent that we should not lust after evil things as they also lusted” (1 Corinthians 10:6).

The immediate context to the communion verse is that of the Apostle Paul’s warnings against the conscious pursuit of evil things because the end result of doing so is the loss of God’s favour and disqualification from the race for the prize of the high calling in Christ Jesus.

“No temptation has overtaken you except such as is common to man; but God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will also make the way of escape, that you may be able to bear it” (1 Corinthians 10:13).

The Apostle Paul outlines that even though God will give us the means to escape these temptations, we have an important role in the matter; actively and consciously exercising temperance and discipline.

iii) The Apostle Uses Two Devices in His Warnings:

The Apostle Paul uses two didactic devices to highlight the danger and seriousness of consciously pursuing temptations: firstly, he uses the example of natural Israel during their wanderings in the desert; and secondly, he reminds us of the underlying meaning and significance of partaking of the cup and the bread at the memorial.

The Apostle Paul’s points and logic here have the purpose of ensuring that his fellow Christians are not disqualified from gaining the prize by pursuing evil things.

The Example of “Israel after the Flesh”

“Observe Israel after the flesh: Are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?” (1 Corinthians 10:18).

“Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come” (1 Corinthians 10:11).

Here the Apostle Paul uses the experiences in the wilderness of natural Israel as a type to illustrate important lessons for spiritual Israel.

1) Idolatry,

2) Sexual immorality,

3) Testing of the Lord, and

4) Murmuring or complaining

The Apostle Paul specifically mentions four evil things “Israel after the flesh” engaged in:  idolatry, sexual immorality, testing of the Lord, and murmuring or complaining

“But with most of them God was not well pleased, for their bodies were scattered in the wilderness” (1 Corinthians 10:5).

Because of this, God was not pleased with them and their bodies He scattered in the wilderness. By outlining these experiences as examples for our instruction, Paul is warning that we face the same dangers – particularly if we become complacent; as he points out in 1 Corinthians 10:12 Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall.”

In the Apostle Paul’s references to “Israel after the flesh” here, he introduces the concept of natural Israel partaking of spiritual nourishment in the wilderness from God by way of our Lord Jesus Christ- for they all “drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:3-4).

“Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat’” (John 6:31).

“Then Moses lifted his hand and struck the rock twice with his rod; and water came out abundantly, and the congregation and their animals drank” (Numbers 20:11).

God miraculously provided Israel with literal food and drink during their desert wanderings, but this is not what Paul is focusing on here. He is referring to spiritual food and drink.

The miraculous manna given to natural Israel was, of course, a great blessing but as Deuteronomy 8:3 tells us, it was intended to teach them the lesson that man lives – in the greater sense, by feeding on “every word that proceeds from the mouth of the Lord” – this is the real spiritual food. The word of God was imparted to them through Moses, so that they were guided and protected by God in their wanderings. God spoke to them through their covenant relationship, and through the many wonderful promises given to them, as well as their miraculous liberation from Egypt.

“They all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink…”(1 Corinthians 10: 3–4).

In this way, Israel after the flesh ate at the Lord’s table, for they all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink.

The Apostle Paul makes clear that it was all of natural Israel that ate at the Lord’s table and he mentions the all twice, probably to make this abundantly clear.

Crucially, we see that the benefits of the spiritual drink and the spiritual food flows from our Lord Jesus to all of the Israelites. It is clear that Jesus did not eat or drink this spiritual food or drink.

In summary: a commonality was established amongst the individual Israelites through all partaking of the same spiritual food and drink – the source of which was our Lord Jesus.

Paul is laying the ground work in his lead up to the important lesson that like Israel after the flesh, Israel after the spirit also eats and drinks at the table of the Lord – gaining far greater blessings but at the same time conferring important responsibilities.

All of Fleshly Israel Partakes, All of Spiritual Israel Partakes

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16)

In 1 Corinthians 10:16 the Apostle Paul reminds his fellow Christians that the literal partaking of the cup and bread is not a meaningless ritual. Rather, by partaking of the cup emblem we show that we are spiritually feeding on the blood of Jesus by gaining justification through faith. Also, by partaking of the bread emblem, we show that we are being spiritually nourished by appropriating the benefits of Jesus’ sacrificed body.

What Does Partaking of the Emblems (the cup and the bread) Show?

It shows that we are eating/drinking at the Table of the Lord with fellow believers; the communion, leading to eternal life.

“Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day” (John 6:54).

i) Partaking of the Cup [drinking of the blood of Jesus] shows:

1) The New Covenant is Ratified and Operative for the Church by the Blood of Jesus, enabling:

– Learning of God

– Having God’s law written on our hearts

2) Believers have True Forgiveness of sins by faith through application of the blood of Jesus as the antitypical sin-offering under the administration of the better sacrifices

3) Believers are Reconciled to God [achieving atonement with God – from1)+2)]

4) Have Received The Promise of the holy spirit

5) Believers are Cleansed from ongoing inadvertent sin [purification through the antitypical ashes of the red heifer – depicted in Jesus washing of the disciples’ feet]

ii) Partaking of the Bread [eating of the flesh of Jesus] shows:

1) Believers Receive and Understand Jesus’ words of truth [through the holy spirit]

2) Have ongoing spiritual nutrition for spiritual growth of the new creature through the indwelling of the holy spirit given at baptism into Christ

– Growing in grace and knowledge

– Learning of God

– Having God’s law written on our hearts

“Then Jesus said to them, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you’” (John 6:53).

All of Jesus’ followers must eat his flesh and drink his blood.

The spiritual drink and spiritual food that we partake of leads to eternal life which is provided for us by the sacrifice of Jesus, by the grace of God.

** We notice in John 6:53 that Jesus is addressing his followers – unless you eat and drink, you have no life in you – plainly Jesus is not including himself here.

1 Corinthians 10:3–4 (NKJV) — all ate the same spiritual food, 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.”

We notice again that the same relationship exists in spiritual Israel as it did in fleshly Israel. All the natural Israelites ate the spiritual food and drank the spiritual drink. There is no suggestion that Jesus somehow also ate and drank of the same spiritual food and drink as fleshly Israel.

“Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you” (Matthew 26:27).

Jesus did not say “let us all drink of it”, rather he said “drink from it, all of you.

Also, Jesus’ instructions were to do this “in remembrance of me not in remembrance of us.

“He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who feeds on Me will live because of Me. 58 This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever (John 6:56–58).

Israel after the flesh ate the manna, died

Spiritual Israel eat/drink of Jesus flesh/blood, live forever

Note how this parallels the type which emphasises its importance in understanding the communion relationship. The Apostle John, in John 6:58, beautifully links the type and the antitype for us: “This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever.”

“This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins (Matthew 26:28).

“In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you’” (Luke 22:20).

Jesus’ blood, through which we have forgiveness of sins, was poured out for us — that is for spiritual Israel. It is clear that Jesus could not eat of his flesh or drink his own blood as he was sinless and undefiled and hence did not require forgiveness. Moreover, if he had any sin, he would not have been able to provide life through his sacrifice. This shows the flow of the blessings of forgiveness of sins, from Jesus by virtue of his sacrificed flesh and poured out blood, is to us.

There is no indication that those feeding and drinking are contributing to the food and drink.

Sacrificial Nourishment for the Levites/Firstborn

“The priests, the Levites—all the tribe of Levi—shall have no part nor inheritance with Israel; they shall eat the offerings of the Lord made by fire, and His portion” (Deuteronomy 18:1).

Observe Israel after the flesh: Are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?”  (1 Corinthians 10:18).

The Apostle Paul then goes even further, and makes the illustration from the type even more specific in order to further illuminate the communion relationship and the significance of our partaking of the cup and bread memorial emblems. He does this by referring to the priests and Levites that did partake of the sacrifices from the altar in the tabernacle. The tribe of Levi had no inheritance in the Land of Israel and so they lived off the offerings made to the Lord. The offerings from the altar in the tabernacle were therefore their source of food.

This illustration is more specific to Christians and is introduced immediately after the communion verses to make clear the significance and nature of the communion relationship and he links the two situations by the word “observe.”

In the tabernacle picture, as with the firstborn of the Passover, the tribe of Levi represented the household of faith — which only has a heavenly inheritance. The tribe of Levi had no land of their own, picturing this heavenly inheritance of the Church of firstborns.

The priests and Levites ate of the sacrifices, indicating that they internalised the nutritional benefits to themselves. Again, there is no suggestion here that by eating of these sacrifices they were sharing in or contributing to the actual sacrifice. Rather, the benefit of the nutritional elements flowed in one direction and one direction only — from the altar to the priest or Levite. In the antitype this translates directly to the flow of spiritual benefits from the altar of God by way of Jesus’ sacrifice to the household of faith, which the Priests and Levites represented.

In this more specific typical picture, the Apostle Paul introduces the important principle that the altar from which the sacrificed food comes, identifies the source of the food. The priests and Levites ate of the sacrifices from the altar in the court of the tabernacle, thus identifying the source of the food as God.

Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to wise men; judge for yourselves what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:14–17).

The communion verses come immediately after the Apostle Paul’s admonition to flee from idolatry; which was a particular problem in the Corinthian church. The Corinthian church consisted of many Christians of Gentile background and these brethren were accustomed to eating food from the markets and in houses of unbelievers that had been sacrificed on pagan altars to pagan gods. The Apostle Paul’s aim here is to illustrate the dangers of continuing to eat these pagan sacrifices by pointing out the crucial significance of the altar from which the sacrifices come. Here he is teaching that those that partake of these sacrifices in the type, are commonly joined to one another by participating of the altar and what it represents, from which the sacrifice comes. In the same way, those that eat of pagan sacrifices are commonly joined by participating in eating from them.  

Partaking of pagan sacrifices means partaking of the table of demons.

“What am I saying then? That an idol is anything, or what is offered to idols is anything? 20 Rather, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to demons and not to God, and I do not want you to have fellowship with demons” (1 Corinthians 10:19–20).

Even though, as the Apostle Paul points out, idols are nothing in themselves, in reality the altar is demonic, so that by partaking of the pagan sacrifice, one is not only joining oneself in fellowship with those pagans that eat the sacrificed food, but is also partaking of the table of demons.

“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons” (1 Corinthians 10:21).

And for a Christian to partake of the table of the Lord is incompatible with partaking of the table of demons.

Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than He?” (1 Corinthians 10:22).

By partaking of these pagan sacrifices, Christians risk provoking the Lord to jealousy.

“You shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, …” (Exodus 20:5).

For our God is a jealous God and He will not tolerate other gods, for all other gods are no gods. So that the worship of anything but God is not only false but is also of Satan — for he is the great usurper, for he wanted to be as the Most High. Worship of anything else but God usurps the authority of God and displaces the true worship reserved only for God.

And this principle is embodied in the first and greatest commandment – “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind” (Matthew 22:37).

So, to summarize, it is evident that the food provided at these altars is not shared in the sense of being contributed to by the partaker. The flow of nutrition, whether typical or spiritual or idolatrous, flows from the altar to the recipient, for the benefit (or detriment) of the partaker.

The modern-day gods that we are in danger of worshipping tend to be more subtle and insidious.

“For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: 19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame— who set their mind on earthly things. 20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ…” (Philippians 3:18–20).

In our modern society we find people pursuing such things as knowledge, health, physical beauty, money, material things, status and respect. Even though most of these have benefits in moderation, when one is consumed by their pursuit it becomes a false god. Therefore, anything that takes our minds and desires from the heavenly things, anything that supplants the true and appropriate worship of our heavenly Father is a false god and amounts to idolatry when pursued to an excessive extent.

A particular danger for the household of faith is the supplanting, consciously or subconsciously, of the authority of the word of God with the words of any imperfect human being. Our faith must be based on the word of God, not on the words of a man. All teachings must be tested thoroughly against scripture.

KOINONIA

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion (koinonia) of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion (koinonia) of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16).

Koinonia is part of the koin- root word group which has the fundamental meaning of sharing in something (indicated by the genitive case) with someone (indicated by the dative case); or the simple cases may be replaced by a prepositional phrase.

“By which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers (koin-) of the divine nature (genitive case), having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust” (2 Peter 1:4).

“Therefore, if there is any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship  (koin-) of the Spirit (genitive case), if any affection and mercy…” (Philippians 2:1).

Another example of the koin- root word group occurs in Philippians 2 verse 1. Paul is talking about the fellowship of the holy spirit – it is evident that each individual of the household of faith has a share in the holy spirit with all other believers. Spirit is in the genitive case indicating what they commonly share in. Importantly the sharing is in the holy spirit not with the holy spirit.

“And so also were James and John, the sons of Zebedee, who were partners (koin-) with Simon (dative case). And Jesus said to Simon, ‘Do not be afraid. From now on you will catch men.’” (Luke 5:10).

So, the word “koinonia” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 means that the household of faith share-the shared experience, in the drinking of the blood of Jesus and eating of his flesh with one another.

In our 1 Corinthians 10:14–22 context, we have the koin- root word used four times.

If drinking of the cup of the Lord meant sharing in the sufferings of the Lord, then those drinking of the cup of demons would have to mean sharing in the sufferings of demons — which evidently is not the case.

Here the Apostle Paul also uses the koin- root word with respect to the Levites being common sharers of the brazen altar and what it represents. Altar here is in the genitive case making clear what the Levites are participating in. It is clear from the actual type and the underlying grammar that the meaning of the koin- root word here does not mean a sharing with the altar and the sacrifices that come from it. The Levites did not contribute to the sacrifices or their suffering in any way — they ate of them and thereby benefitted from them.

By eating of the bread, and drinking of the cup introduced by Jesus at the memorial, we show that we are commonly – with one another, sharing in the eating of the flesh of Jesus and drinking of his blood. Thereby we receive the spiritual nutrition essential and indispensable for our salvation.

Although sharing in the sufferings and death of Jesus is clearly taught in the scriptures, Paul is not teaching this here in the communion verse.

“Is it Not”: Indicates a Reminder of Something Already Taught Not Something New

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:16–17).

That the Apostle Paul is bringing to mind something familiar rather than a new teaching [like a secondary meaning] is indicated by his use of the phrase “is it not”, twice in the communion verses.

Technically, “is it not” is a figure of speech referred to as “interrogation”; this occurs when a question is asked without waiting for the answer. There are different forms of interrogation and here it is called “interrogation in negative affirmation“; this occurs when the question is put in the negative, and the answer must be in the affirmative, and very emphatically so – indicating that the point made is or should be known already by those to whom the question is addressed.

Let us look at other instances of use of this figure of speech.

“Therefore, I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing?” (Matthew 6:25).

We find it is used in Matthew 6:25 by Jesus to show that indeed life is more than food and the body more than clothing. The important point to glean here is that the “is not” did not introduce something they did not already know.

“So all bore witness to Him, and marveled at the gracious words which proceeded out of His mouth. And they said, ‘Is this not Joseph’s son?’” (Luke 4:22)

We find another example of this interrogative figure of speech in Luke 4 verse 22.  Because of the gracious words that proceeded out of Jesus’ mouth, the people assumed that he was a sage from a far-off land with new found wisdom, and yet the interrogation in negative affirmation “is not” emphasises the fact that Jesus and his family were well known to them.

Therefore, the use of this “is not” figure of speech suggests that the communion verses are a reminder or an emphasis of something that was clear and known, rather than introducing a new truth.

Partaking of the Memorial Emblems Shows That We are Eating and Drinking at the Table of the Lord.

The memorial truth that the Apostle Paul is reminding us of is that eating of the bread and the drinking of the cup emblems indicates that we are together figuratively partaking of the sacrificed body and shed blood of Jesus – and thereby we are eating and drinking at the table of the Lord.

Sharing in the Sufferings of Jesus an Important Teaching – But Not Shown in Partaking of the Memorial Emblems

Let us be clear that we are not saying that faithful followers of Jesus do not share in his sufferings and death – for this is taught clearly in the word of God. Philippians 3:10 is a case in point:

“that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death…” (Philippians 3:10).

But this is not Paul’s teaching in his reference to our partaking of the memorial emblems in 1 Corinthians 10:16.

Fixing KJV 1 Corinthians 10:17

The Rendering of 1 Corinthians 10:17 in the KJV, NKJV and even the RVIC2016 is faulty.

“For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:17, NKJV).

 104 seeing that we the many are one bread, one body: for we all partake.” (1 Corinthians 10:17, (RVIC2016).

When we read 1 Corinthians 10:17 in the KJV, NKJV and even the RVIC2016, we are left with the thought that by partaking of the bread emblem the followers of Jesus become that bread. Ostensibly this does not seem to make sense, but does seem to give credence to the thought that the Church becomes part of the sacrifice from which it benefits.

1 Corinthians 10:17 should read – seeing that there is one bread, we, who are many, are one body”

The Church is referred to as “one body” but never as “the/one bread.” Only Jesus is referred to as “the bread.”

The more modern translations, including the Diaglott, show that the greater number of modern translators overwhelmingly favour the alternate rendering – seeing that there is one bread, we, who are many, are one body. The“we” belongs with the many and one body, not the bread – for as the verse makes clear we are one body because we partake of that bread.

We Need to Keep Eating at the Table of the Lord in Order to Gain the Imperishable Crown

As followers of Jesus, we need to keep spiritually feeding on his flesh and drink his blood to continue to receive these incredibly gracious benefits during this age of darkness. We remind ourselves of these spiritual benefits flowing from God to us based on Jesus’ shed blood and sacrificed body, particularly at memorial time.

What a privilege it is to eat and drink at the table of the Lord; for it leads to eternal life. But doing so also carries all important responsibilities. We have to avoid all forms of idolatry, particularly the subtle forms, for truly we are on trial for life, now.

“Now the just shall live by faith; But if anyone draws back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” 39 But we are not of those who draw back to perdition, but of those who believe to the saving of the soul(Hebrews 10:38–39).

But if we are careful and listen to God’s word, for Jesus speaks to us through it, we will not be of those that draw back to destruction, but rather we will be of those that are faithful, temperate and disciplined, leading to eternal life – to the glory of our Heavenly Father.

“Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: Thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over” (Psalm 23:5).

Amen.

The Mighty To Save – Hymns of Dawn No. 9

The Mighty To Save – Hymns of Dawn No. 9

Bible Scriptures Associated With This Hymn

But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin” (1 John 1:7).

“And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

“(18) … you were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your forefathers, not with perishable things such as silver or gold, (19) but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot” (1 Peter 1:18-19).

“And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Corinthians 6:11).

“And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” (Acts 2:21).

“For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life” (Romans 5:10).

 For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved” (Romans 10:10).

“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God” (Ephesians 2:8, KJV).

Lyrics

1.
All glory to Jesus be giv’n,
That life and salvation are free,
And all may be wash’d and forgiv’n;
Yes, Jesus has sav’d even me.

Chorus
Christ Jesus is mighty to save,
And all his salvation may know
On his merit I lean, and his blood makes me clean,
Yes, his blood has wash’d whiter than snow.

2.
From the darkness of sin and despair,
Out into the light of his love,
He has bro’t me and made me an heir
To kingdoms and mansions above.

3.
O! the rapturous heights of his love,
The measureless depths of his grace.
My soul all his fulness would prove,
And live in his loving embrace.

4.
In him all my wants are supplied,
His love starts my heaven below,
And freely his blood is applied,
His blood that makes whiter than snow.

THE PRECIOUS BLOOD OF CHRIST

(An article from “Reprints of the Original Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Presence,” R1229 – R1231.)

All of God’s dear children trust in the precious blood of the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. They know, … that the blood of Christ is the principal topic of God’s revelation, and the foundation of his great plan of salvation. They know that the expression, “blood of Christ,” somehow stands for sacrifice of Christ, though they are sadly confused by false ideas on the so-called “trinity,” and consequently upon what our Lord Jesus gave as the sacrifice for sins.

In this “evil day” the great Adversary of God and his truth is taking advantage of this confusion, this lack of clearness of understanding, to overthrow faith in the ransom, the foundation doctrine of Christianity. The process is, to scoff at the idea of blood cleansing from sin, and to insinuate that most Christians believe in having literal blood sprinkled on their hearts, or that they are cleansed from sin by plunging into a literal fountain filled with blood drawn from Immanuel’s veins. Thus the idea of blood-cleansing is scouted as being on a par with the doctrine of everlasting torment, and belonging to the savage minds of the “dark ages.”

As a matter of fact, no sane Christian people have ever held this literal and absurd view of the meaning of the blood of Christ. It has always been recognized as synonymous with sacrifice. Any fair-minded person can readily see this to be true as well of the use of the word blood by the Apostles, as in the hymns of all denominations of Christian people. Take that grand old hymn—

“There is a fountain filled with blood
Drawn from Immanuel’s veins,
And sinners, plunged beneath that flood,
Lose all their guilty stains.”

What could more clearly express the very essence of the Bible doctrine; and how absurd for any to try to make out that those who thus express their sentiments believe in a river of literal blood. The hymn expresses well and beautifully the very thought of the Prophet (Zech. 13:1), “In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David for sin and for uncleanness.”

There is surely an object in this misrepresentation of the general views of Christian people. Is it to confuse the mind, excite disgust at the thought of blood, and swimming in rivers of blood, etc., and then under the warmth of the denial: “Such is not my belief even if my fathers did believe it,” to point out to the confused one a theory which it is desired to impress? It looks very much that way. The theory then advanced is, that when Christ’s blood is mentioned, the word blood stands for carnal nature, and the understanding should be—Christ slew HIS carnal nature, as an example of how all his followers and the world in general should slay their carnal natures.

Ah! no wonder that, with such a theory to advance, the great Adversary first tried to excite disgust for any and every thing connected with “the blood.” He well knew that, unless disgust for “the blood” should be aroused and form a barrier of mental prejudice, some of God’s children would be sure to examine the forty-three places where the Scriptures mention the blood of Christ, and the many more where they mention the blood of animals which typified his blood. And if they would but investigate, they would find that which would prove fatal to the theory he wished to establish as new light.

The few who look to God’s word for instruction find that in these forty-three times that the blood of Christ is mentioned, neither our Lord nor the apostles once hint that the blood of Jesus represented the slaying of his carnal nature, nor that he had in or about him anything evil that required to be destroyed. They find, on the contrary, that there was no cause of death found in him except in the sight of the hypocritical Pharisees. And they find that, to the contrary of the theory we are criticizing, these forty-three inspired testimonies on the subject declare unitedly, not that our Lord shed his blood for himself and as an example to all men to shed their blood for themselves and thus reach perfection, but that, whatever blood symbolizes, it is his blood that cleanseth us from all sin.

Yes, his blood became the basis for the forgiveness of our sins, made peace for us, opened up the way to reconciliation, and transferred us from the domain of sentenced culprits, back to sonship in the family of God. So says the great Apostle Paul—Col. 1:20Heb. 9:1210:1913:12Rom. 3:255:9Eph. 1:72:13Col. 1:14 and Acts 20:28-31. So declares the great Apostle Peter—1 Pet. 1:2,19. So testifies the beloved Apostle John—1 John 1:7Rev. 1:55:97:14.

Truly the Word of God is sufficient that the man of God may be thoroughly furnished against all the wiles, glosses and sophistries of Satan. Even those who do not see clearly what the blood does signify or symbolize, can, without aid, quickly see that it means nothing at all like what this erroneous view would set forth. The idea of the blood of Christ signifying the slaying by him of his carnal nature is as far from the testimony of the above passages of God’s Word as the East is from the West.

But what is the true significance of the blood of Christ when used in reference to our cleansing from sin, as in the above citations? If it does not mean literal blood, what does it mean?

We answer by giving God’s definition of what blood represents or symbolizes. The blood is the life. (Gen. 9:4-6.) “For the life of the flesh is in the blood; and I have appointed it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls [lives, beings]: for it is the blood [sacrificed life] that maketh atonement for the soul [or being].”—Lev. 17:11,14.

By accepting God’s definition of what blood signified, in all the sacrifices, as well as in the case of the “one sacrifice for all” which our Lord Jesus presented, all confusion disappears.

As blood represents the life, the shedding of blood represents the loss of life—death

So then, the expressions—the Lamb slain, the cleansing blood of the Lamb, the precious blood of Christ, no more refer to literal blood than to a literal lamb, but to the death of Christ. True, our Lord’s side was actually pierced and blood flowed out, but the expression, “He hath redeemed us by his blood” (by his death), would have been equally true and proper, if not a drop of his literal blood had passed from his veins; for it merely signifies that he redeemed us by his death—by the sacrifice or loss of his life. Thus it is written, “He poured out his soul [being—life] unto death;” and again that he made “his soul [being—life] an offering for sin.”—Isa. 53:12,10.

So then, God’s people have always had the pith of the truth on this subject, when believing that the “blood of Christ” meant the sacrifice of Christ. That is the correct thought. Their difficulty is, that when they come in contact with errors their lack of a clear understanding of what sacrifice Christ did make for the sins of the world, combined with erroneous ideas of a trinity, make them liable to be led astray from the foundation doctrine of Christianity—”that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures.” Finding that they cannot clearly analyze their own views, they are very susceptible to the false view we criticize, which first ridicules the idea which no one holds, that it is the literal blood of Christ which washes away our sins, and then offers the proposition, that Christ’s blood, when referred to in Scriptures, represents his slaying of his own carnal nature and desires, as an example to men, how they must each slay his own carnal nature and desires. According to this unscriptural theory each man would be his own Savior. And not only so, but if each would be a great Savior in proportion to the work accomplished, then the Lord Jesus would be the least of all; because, even those who claim that he had a carnal nature to crucify or slay cannot dispute that many men have far more of evil and sin working in their members to overcome than our Lord had. And if each slays sin in himself, the more degraded the man the greater the salvation, and the greater he is as his own Savior.

But let each compare this view briefly with the view presented in the above cited statements of the apostles respecting the blood of Christ—the life which he laid down on our behalf.

The life of the world in general was gone—forfeited in father Adam’s failure when on trial—all not absolutely dead were dying. They were under the execution of the just sentence of God, “Dust thou art and unto dust shalt thou return.” God had decreed a sentence which would most fully manifest the law of the universe—that no sinner shall live—and one which at the same time furnished an opportunity for revealing to angels and to men his unswerving justice, his great love, and his boundless wisdom and power. When God decreed death as the penalty for sin, so that a ransom (a corresponding price—a just one to die for [or instead of] the unjust one—Rom. 5:17) would be necessary to the release of mankind from the sentence, he did so in full view of the course he would pursue. His wisdom foresaw the results of leaving Adam to his own free will—that in his inexperience he would not submit his will to the will of his creator and would therefore get into sin and under the sentence of death—extinction. And his wisdom also foresaw how his love could work out a plan for the salvation of his creatures. And he foresaw that the well beloved and only begotten Son would humbly consent to carry out the divine plan—to leave the glory and honor of the heavenly nature, and as the man Christ Jesus give himself a ransom for Adam and his race.—Phil. 2:7,81 Tim. 2:5,6.

Since the penalty was death, the ransom necessary to release the dead and dying world from the sentence under which all were, and to secure them restitution—resurrection—and an individual trial for everlasting life, was the death of this perfect man whom God thus provided. And this simple and easily comprehended plan was carried out. The man Christ Jesus gave himself a ransom for all;—he died, the just for the unjust;—he died for our sins. The dying on the cross, the drops of bloody sweat in Gethsemane, the pierced hands and side and flowing blood were not necessary to our ransom. None of these things were the penalties of sin. God’s sentence against Adam—”dying thou shalt die”—did not specify what manner of death, nor what amount of suffering should be connected with it.

Death alone was the penalty, and had God’s will been such, for our Lord to have met death in any other form than crucifixion would have been equally our ransom price.

Many do not see that in our Lord two things were being accomplished at once. [1] Our ransom was being provided, and [2] our Lord’s extreme fidelity to the Heavenly Father was being tested and proved in the same sacrifice. As our ransom, death in any form would do; but as an unbounded proof of his humility and obedience to the Father’s plan, the shame of the cross was added.—Phil. 2:7,8.

The result of his death as it affects himself is that he is now highly exalted and made partaker of the divine nature, that all men should honor the Son even as they honor the Father.—Phil. 2:8,9John 5:23.

The result of his death as it affects mankind is that it places the world in his hands as the purchaser, to the intent that, without violating the law and sentence of God (which he satisfied with his own [life] blood), he may restore men to perfection and offer everlasting life to all who will come into harmony with God’s perfect law through him—under his direction and assistance.

THIS IS JUSTIFICATION

(An article from “Reprints of the Original Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Presence,”  R1231.)

Thus we are justified by his blood [by the life which he laid down for us]: our sins and imperfections are passed over, forgiven, covered by the merit of the ransom which he gave.

Not only sins past and present, but also all future sins—all that are directly or indirectly the results of Adam’s transgression—all that are not our own, that our wills do not approve of, are not reckoned any longer to those who are in Christ Jesus.

No wonder these have joy and peace as they realize that there is now no longer any condemnation against them.—Rom. 5:18:1.

Here begins the work of sacrifice and crucifixion with Christ to which many are invited, but to which few respond. It is a mistake, however, to consider this sacrificing as a slaughter of our sins or as having anything to do with the “slaying of the enmity” mentioned by the Apostle. On the contrary (under the Law, which was typical), no sacrifice could be offered unto the Lord that had any blemish or imperfection—blemishes representing sin. So it is that no one is ever invited to become a sacrificer with Christ until he has first been justified from all things—cleansed from all sins—by the precious blood [sacrificed life] of Christ. And if these who are cleansed from sins—justified from all things—are told that they may present their bodies [“holy and acceptable unto God” through Jesus Christ] as living sacrifices, it must be their justified selves and not their sins that they present, and that the Lord proposes to accept.

The “enmity” which the Apostle declares Christ abolished (Eph. 2:15) was not sin in himself, nor anything in himself; but in or by the sacrifice of his flesh, the man Christ Jesus abolished the enmity or opposition of the Jewish Law Covenant, under which fleshly Israel labored. When that Covenant which they could not keep was fulfilled by our Lord Jesus and passed away (Col. 2:14), all who had been under it were released from its requirements of absolute perfection which opposed and condemned them all, that they might receive through Christ forgiveness of sins—through faith in his blood.

The privilege of becoming joint-sacrifices with Christ is limited, as truly as is the privilege of becoming joint-heirs with him. “Now is the acceptable time.” Both the privilege and the reward of sacrifice will end with this ageNow is the time when God will accept the living sacrifices of all who (after being justified from all sin by the blood of Christ) come unto God through him.

Such are not invited to sacrifice for their own sins, then, for their sins must be canceled before any sacrifice would be acceptable. But they are invited to sacrifice time, talent, influence, self-ease, and lawful self-gratification, in the service of the truth—in the general cause of God against the great enemy, Sin, and for the recovery of sinners out of it through Christ Jesus.

The sufferings of Christ, to a share in which all believers cleansed by his blood were invited during the Gospel age, will soon end. They will be filled up or completed. (Col. 1:24.) Then the glory will follow—the glory of Christ Jesus and also of all the members of his body, the church, those who suffered for the truth (not for their sins), sacrificing their justified selves with him and in the cause of God. Then the reign of righteousness will begin and none will have occasion to lay down his life for the truth’s sake thereafter.

Many have believed in the precious blood and have had joy and peace in believing and then heard the call to the privilege of self-sacrifice with Christ; but few have responded, and hence few are chosen to be with him and behold and share his glory and his throne, and his new nature—the divine nature—far above both the human and the angelic natures, even in their grandest perfections. Let us, acceptable to God through the precious blood, make our calling and election sure.Let us lay aside every weight and hindrance and run with patience the race of self-denial to the end—looking unto Jesus, the author of our faith, to finish it by receiving us to the heavenly mansion.

Suggested Further Reading

Here are some free ONLINE reading articles in relation to the Heavenly Father—Jehovah, his Son—Christ Jesus—“a ransom FOR ALL… to be testified in due time” (1 Timothy 2:6), and about the holy Spirit (the understanding of God), with clear explanations about why the anti-Christ teaching of “the trinity”—introduced by the Roman Catholic Church system (the “Beast” in the Book of Revelation)—is not what the Bible teaches. The Bible Students Movement also does not support the false teaching about purgatory nor does it support the Roman Catholic System’s false teaching about people being sent to a place where they burning up forever as this certaining does not reflect Jehovah’s divine, perfect love, justice, power and wisdom … “who is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love” (Psalm 103:8). For the interested Reader, we urge you to consider the following articles and posts:

The Doctrine of the Trinity – Mystery or Confusion by Br. David Rice.
http://www.heraldmag.org/1999/99nd_3.htm

The Origin of the Trinity – From Paganism To Constantine by Sr. Cher-El L. Hagensick.
http://www.heraldmag.org/olb/Contents/doctrine/The%20Origin%20of%20the%20Trinity.htm

Facts About the Trinity
http://www.heraldmag.org/olb/contents/doctrine/FACTS%20ABOUT%20THE%20TRINITY.htm

God and the Trinities
http://www.heraldmag.org/literature/doc_42.htm

Development of the “Trinity Doctrine” by Br. Tom Gilbert.
http://www.beautiesofthetruth.org/Archive/Library/Doctrine/Mags/Bot/90s/2010d.pdf

Understanding John 1:1 by Br. Richard Doctor.
http://www.beautiesofthetruth.org/Archive/Library/Doctrine/Mags/Bot/90s/2010d.pdf

Father, Son and Holy Spirit
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2016/06/23/father-son-and-holy-spirit/

What Is the Heavenly Father’s Name
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2017/06/27/gods-name-what-is-the-heavenly-fathers-name-that-we-are-to-hallow-and-why/

Jesus – The Name
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2017/07/05/jesus-the-name/

The Doctrine of Christ – Booklet
http://www.biblestudents.com/docs/DoctrineChrist.pdf

Who Is the World’s RANSOM and Why?
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2016/03/29/who-is-the-worlds-ransom-and-why/

Hymn Book Purchase

The Hymns Of Dawn (hymn book) can be purchased at:

The Chicago Bible Students Online Bookstore: https://chicagobible.org/product-category/books/page/4/

The Dawn Bible Students Association: http://www.dawnbible.com/dawnpub.htm

Acknowledgment & References

  • Br. Charles Taze Russell — the founder of the Bible Students movement, who is the compiler of “Poems and Hymns of Millennial Dawn” which was published in Allegheny, Pa., in 1890. This Bible Students’ devotional originally contained a total of 151 poems and 333 hymns.

POEMS-AND-HYMNS-OF-MILLENNIAL-DAWN

Later on, the hymns from this book formed a basis for the hymnal titled ““Hymns of Dawn” which was published by the Dawn Bible Students Association in East Rutherford, New Jersey (USA) and the 1999 edition contains a total of 361 hymns.

Hymns of Dawn.jpg

Links and Bible Resources
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/category/links/

Beliefs
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/category/beliefs/

 

This post’s URL:
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2017/12/02/the-mighty-to-save-hymns-of-dawn-no-9/

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.