2. Eating At the Table of the Lord

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16)

What does the Apostle Paul mean by the “communion of the blood and body of Christ”?

“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons” (1 Corinthians 10:21).

In Chapter 10 of the first epistle to the Corinthian church, the Apostle Paul illuminates and puts in context his reference to our communion in partaking of the memorial emblems of the cup and bread.

What Pastor Charles Russell Taught

Pastor Charles Russell quoted 1 Corinthians 10:2 in The Reprints of the Original Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Presence and taught that there was a secondary meaning to the bread and wine emblems: that the (1) “broken loaf” represents the breaking of all his mystical members” and “communion of the blood of Christ” means a “participation in the sufferings and death of Jesus.” R3364.

He based this teaching of a secondary meaning on the word “communion” in Corinthians 10:2 and that since the word “communion” comes from the ancient Greek word koinonia; which in its basic sense means a common union with someone in a shared experience, he thought that the shared experience is “the sufferings and death” and that the common union was with Jesus.

Let us now consider the 1 Corinthian Chapter 10 context, in order to understand the Apostle Paul’s teachings in this section, and thereby specifically examine whether this proposed secondary meaning is actually what the Apostle Paul was teaching or not.

The Context:

i) The Immediate Context: 1 Corinthians 10:1-22

The verses that define the immediate context for understanding the communion verse [16] are found in 1 Corinthians 10:1-22.

Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea” (1 Corinthians 10:1, NKJV).

δέ de; a primitive word; but, and, now

We notice that verse 1 uses the conjunction δέ, meaning but, and, now here, the NKJV translates δέ as “moreover.” This tells us that this section is also linked to what came before and therefore that there is a wider context to consider also.

ii) The Wider Context: It is Possible to Lose the Imperishable Crown

“… I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some” (1 Corinthians 9:22).

In the previous few Chapters in 1 Corinthians, the Apostle Paul outlines his determination to put nothing in the way of the Gospel and to be “all things to all men” in order to “save some.”

“And everyone who competes for the prize is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a perishable crown, but we for an imperishable crown. 26 Therefore I run thus: not with uncertainty. Thus I fight: not as one who beats the air. 27 But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified(1 Corinthians 9:25–27).

The paragraph immediately prior to Chapter 10, the Apostle Paul outlines the possibility that it is possible to be disqualified from gaining the imperishable crown if we do not run in the race with temperance and discipline, and therefore we can expect that what follows will be practical advice and warnings, as well as bringing to mind relevant aspects of our faith to give us strength and determination in order to gain the prize of that imperishable crown.

iii) The Immediate Context: Warnings Against the Conscious Pursuit of Evil Things

“Now these things became our examples, to the intent that we should not lust after evil things as they also lusted” (1 Corinthians 10:6).

The immediate context to the communion verse is that of the Apostle Paul’s warnings against the conscious pursuit of evil things because the end result of doing so is the loss of God’s favour and disqualification from the race for the prize of the high calling in Christ Jesus.

“No temptation has overtaken you except such as is common to man; but God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will also make the way of escape, that you may be able to bear it” (1 Corinthians 10:13).

The Apostle Paul outlines that even though God will give us the means to escape these temptations, we have an important role in the matter; actively and consciously exercising temperance and discipline.

iii) The Apostle Uses Two Devices in His Warnings:

The Apostle Paul uses two didactic devices to highlight the danger and seriousness of consciously pursuing temptations: firstly, he uses the example of natural Israel during their wanderings in the desert; and secondly, he reminds us of the underlying meaning and significance of partaking of the cup and the bread at the memorial.

The Apostle Paul’s points and logic here have the purpose of ensuring that his fellow Christians are not disqualified from gaining the prize by pursuing evil things.

The Example of “Israel after the Flesh”

“Observe Israel after the flesh: Are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?” (1 Corinthians 10:18).

“Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come” (1 Corinthians 10:11).

Here the Apostle Paul uses the experiences in the wilderness of natural Israel as a type to illustrate important lessons for spiritual Israel.

1) Idolatry,

2) Sexual immorality,

3) Testing of the Lord, and

4) Murmuring or complaining

The Apostle Paul specifically mentions four evil things “Israel after the flesh” engaged in:  idolatry, sexual immorality, testing of the Lord, and murmuring or complaining

“But with most of them God was not well pleased, for their bodies were scattered in the wilderness” (1 Corinthians 10:5).

Because of this, God was not pleased with them and their bodies He scattered in the wilderness. By outlining these experiences as examples for our instruction, Paul is warning that we face the same dangers – particularly if we become complacent; as he points out in 1 Corinthians 10:12 Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall.”

In the Apostle Paul’s references to “Israel after the flesh” here, he introduces the concept of natural Israel partaking of spiritual nourishment in the wilderness from God by way of our Lord Jesus Christ- for they all “drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:3-4).

“Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat’” (John 6:31).

“Then Moses lifted his hand and struck the rock twice with his rod; and water came out abundantly, and the congregation and their animals drank” (Numbers 20:11).

God miraculously provided Israel with literal food and drink during their desert wanderings, but this is not what Paul is focusing on here. He is referring to spiritual food and drink.

The miraculous manna given to natural Israel was, of course, a great blessing but as Deuteronomy 8:3 tells us, it was intended to teach them the lesson that man lives – in the greater sense, by feeding on “every word that proceeds from the mouth of the Lord” – this is the real spiritual food. The word of God was imparted to them through Moses, so that they were guided and protected by God in their wanderings. God spoke to them through their covenant relationship, and through the many wonderful promises given to them, as well as their miraculous liberation from Egypt.

“They all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink…”(1 Corinthians 10: 3–4).

In this way, Israel after the flesh ate at the Lord’s table, for they all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink.

The Apostle Paul makes clear that it was all of natural Israel that ate at the Lord’s table and he mentions the all twice, probably to make this abundantly clear.

Crucially, we see that the benefits of the spiritual drink and the spiritual food flows from our Lord Jesus to all of the Israelites. It is clear that Jesus did not eat or drink this spiritual food or drink.

In summary: a commonality was established amongst the individual Israelites through all partaking of the same spiritual food and drink – the source of which was our Lord Jesus.

Paul is laying the ground work in his lead up to the important lesson that like Israel after the flesh, Israel after the spirit also eats and drinks at the table of the Lord – gaining far greater blessings but at the same time conferring important responsibilities.

All of Fleshly Israel Partakes, All of Spiritual Israel Partakes

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16)

In 1 Corinthians 10:16 the Apostle Paul reminds his fellow Christians that the literal partaking of the cup and bread is not a meaningless ritual. Rather, by partaking of the cup emblem we show that we are spiritually feeding on the blood of Jesus by gaining justification through faith. Also, by partaking of the bread emblem, we show that we are being spiritually nourished by appropriating the benefits of Jesus’ sacrificed body.

What Does Partaking of the Emblems (the cup and the bread) Show?

It shows that we are eating/drinking at the Table of the Lord with fellow believers; the communion, leading to eternal life.

“Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day” (John 6:54).

i) Partaking of the Cup [drinking of the blood of Jesus] shows:

1) The New Covenant is Ratified and Operative for the Church by the Blood of Jesus, enabling:

– Learning of God

– Having God’s law written on our hearts

2) Believers have True Forgiveness of sins by faith through application of the blood of Jesus as the antitypical sin-offering under the administration of the better sacrifices

3) Believers are Reconciled to God [achieving atonement with God – from1)+2)]

4) Have Received The Promise of the holy spirit

5) Believers are Cleansed from ongoing inadvertent sin [purification through the antitypical ashes of the red heifer – depicted in Jesus washing of the disciples’ feet]

ii) Partaking of the Bread [eating of the flesh of Jesus] shows:

1) Believers Receive and Understand Jesus’ words of truth [through the holy spirit]

2) Have ongoing spiritual nutrition for spiritual growth of the new creature through the indwelling of the holy spirit given at baptism into Christ

– Growing in grace and knowledge

– Learning of God

– Having God’s law written on our hearts

“Then Jesus said to them, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you’” (John 6:53).

All of Jesus’ followers must eat his flesh and drink his blood.

The spiritual drink and spiritual food that we partake of leads to eternal life which is provided for us by the sacrifice of Jesus, by the grace of God.

** We notice in John 6:53 that Jesus is addressing his followers – unless you eat and drink, you have no life in you – plainly Jesus is not including himself here.

1 Corinthians 10:3–4 (NKJV) — all ate the same spiritual food, 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.”

We notice again that the same relationship exists in spiritual Israel as it did in fleshly Israel. All the natural Israelites ate the spiritual food and drank the spiritual drink. There is no suggestion that Jesus somehow also ate and drank of the same spiritual food and drink as fleshly Israel.

“Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you” (Matthew 26:27).

Jesus did not say “let us all drink of it”, rather he said “drink from it, all of you.

Also, Jesus’ instructions were to do this “in remembrance of me not in remembrance of us.

“He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who feeds on Me will live because of Me. 58 This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever (John 6:56–58).

Israel after the flesh ate the manna, died

Spiritual Israel eat/drink of Jesus flesh/blood, live forever

Note how this parallels the type which emphasises its importance in understanding the communion relationship. The Apostle John, in John 6:58, beautifully links the type and the antitype for us: “This is the bread which came down from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this bread will live forever.”

“This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins (Matthew 26:28).

“In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you’” (Luke 22:20).

Jesus’ blood, through which we have forgiveness of sins, was poured out for us — that is for spiritual Israel. It is clear that Jesus could not eat of his flesh or drink his own blood as he was sinless and undefiled and hence did not require forgiveness. Moreover, if he had any sin, he would not have been able to provide life through his sacrifice. This shows the flow of the blessings of forgiveness of sins, from Jesus by virtue of his sacrificed flesh and poured out blood, is to us.

There is no indication that those feeding and drinking are contributing to the food and drink.

Sacrificial Nourishment for the Levites/Firstborn

“The priests, the Levites—all the tribe of Levi—shall have no part nor inheritance with Israel; they shall eat the offerings of the Lord made by fire, and His portion” (Deuteronomy 18:1).

Observe Israel after the flesh: Are not those who eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?”  (1 Corinthians 10:18).

The Apostle Paul then goes even further, and makes the illustration from the type even more specific in order to further illuminate the communion relationship and the significance of our partaking of the cup and bread memorial emblems. He does this by referring to the priests and Levites that did partake of the sacrifices from the altar in the tabernacle. The tribe of Levi had no inheritance in the Land of Israel and so they lived off the offerings made to the Lord. The offerings from the altar in the tabernacle were therefore their source of food.

This illustration is more specific to Christians and is introduced immediately after the communion verses to make clear the significance and nature of the communion relationship and he links the two situations by the word “observe.”

In the tabernacle picture, as with the firstborn of the Passover, the tribe of Levi represented the household of faith — which only has a heavenly inheritance. The tribe of Levi had no land of their own, picturing this heavenly inheritance of the Church of firstborns.

The priests and Levites ate of the sacrifices, indicating that they internalised the nutritional benefits to themselves. Again, there is no suggestion here that by eating of these sacrifices they were sharing in or contributing to the actual sacrifice. Rather, the benefit of the nutritional elements flowed in one direction and one direction only — from the altar to the priest or Levite. In the antitype this translates directly to the flow of spiritual benefits from the altar of God by way of Jesus’ sacrifice to the household of faith, which the Priests and Levites represented.

In this more specific typical picture, the Apostle Paul introduces the important principle that the altar from which the sacrificed food comes, identifies the source of the food. The priests and Levites ate of the sacrifices from the altar in the court of the tabernacle, thus identifying the source of the food as God.

Therefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak as to wise men; judge for yourselves what I say. 16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:14–17).

The communion verses come immediately after the Apostle Paul’s admonition to flee from idolatry; which was a particular problem in the Corinthian church. The Corinthian church consisted of many Christians of Gentile background and these brethren were accustomed to eating food from the markets and in houses of unbelievers that had been sacrificed on pagan altars to pagan gods. The Apostle Paul’s aim here is to illustrate the dangers of continuing to eat these pagan sacrifices by pointing out the crucial significance of the altar from which the sacrifices come. Here he is teaching that those that partake of these sacrifices in the type, are commonly joined to one another by participating of the altar and what it represents, from which the sacrifice comes. In the same way, those that eat of pagan sacrifices are commonly joined by participating in eating from them.  

Partaking of pagan sacrifices means partaking of the table of demons.

“What am I saying then? That an idol is anything, or what is offered to idols is anything? 20 Rather, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to demons and not to God, and I do not want you to have fellowship with demons” (1 Corinthians 10:19–20).

Even though, as the Apostle Paul points out, idols are nothing in themselves, in reality the altar is demonic, so that by partaking of the pagan sacrifice, one is not only joining oneself in fellowship with those pagans that eat the sacrificed food, but is also partaking of the table of demons.

“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lord’s table and of the table of demons” (1 Corinthians 10:21).

And for a Christian to partake of the table of the Lord is incompatible with partaking of the table of demons.

Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than He?” (1 Corinthians 10:22).

By partaking of these pagan sacrifices, Christians risk provoking the Lord to jealousy.

“You shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, …” (Exodus 20:5).

For our God is a jealous God and He will not tolerate other gods, for all other gods are no gods. So that the worship of anything but God is not only false but is also of Satan — for he is the great usurper, for he wanted to be as the Most High. Worship of anything else but God usurps the authority of God and displaces the true worship reserved only for God.

And this principle is embodied in the first and greatest commandment – “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind” (Matthew 22:37).

So, to summarize, it is evident that the food provided at these altars is not shared in the sense of being contributed to by the partaker. The flow of nutrition, whether typical or spiritual or idolatrous, flows from the altar to the recipient, for the benefit (or detriment) of the partaker.

The modern-day gods that we are in danger of worshipping tend to be more subtle and insidious.

“For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: 19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame— who set their mind on earthly things. 20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ…” (Philippians 3:18–20).

In our modern society we find people pursuing such things as knowledge, health, physical beauty, money, material things, status and respect. Even though most of these have benefits in moderation, when one is consumed by their pursuit it becomes a false god. Therefore, anything that takes our minds and desires from the heavenly things, anything that supplants the true and appropriate worship of our heavenly Father is a false god and amounts to idolatry when pursued to an excessive extent.

A particular danger for the household of faith is the supplanting, consciously or subconsciously, of the authority of the word of God with the words of any imperfect human being. Our faith must be based on the word of God, not on the words of a man. All teachings must be tested thoroughly against scripture.

KOINONIA

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion (koinonia) of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion (koinonia) of the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16).

Koinonia is part of the koin- root word group which has the fundamental meaning of sharing in something (indicated by the genitive case) with someone (indicated by the dative case); or the simple cases may be replaced by a prepositional phrase.

“By which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers (koin-) of the divine nature (genitive case), having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust” (2 Peter 1:4).

“Therefore, if there is any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship  (koin-) of the Spirit (genitive case), if any affection and mercy…” (Philippians 2:1).

Another example of the koin- root word group occurs in Philippians 2 verse 1. Paul is talking about the fellowship of the holy spirit – it is evident that each individual of the household of faith has a share in the holy spirit with all other believers. Spirit is in the genitive case indicating what they commonly share in. Importantly the sharing is in the holy spirit not with the holy spirit.

“And so also were James and John, the sons of Zebedee, who were partners (koin-) with Simon (dative case). And Jesus said to Simon, ‘Do not be afraid. From now on you will catch men.’” (Luke 5:10).

So, the word “koinonia” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 means that the household of faith share-the shared experience, in the drinking of the blood of Jesus and eating of his flesh with one another.

In our 1 Corinthians 10:14–22 context, we have the koin- root word used four times.

If drinking of the cup of the Lord meant sharing in the sufferings of the Lord, then those drinking of the cup of demons would have to mean sharing in the sufferings of demons — which evidently is not the case.

Here the Apostle Paul also uses the koin- root word with respect to the Levites being common sharers of the brazen altar and what it represents. Altar here is in the genitive case making clear what the Levites are participating in. It is clear from the actual type and the underlying grammar that the meaning of the koin- root word here does not mean a sharing with the altar and the sacrifices that come from it. The Levites did not contribute to the sacrifices or their suffering in any way — they ate of them and thereby benefitted from them.

By eating of the bread, and drinking of the cup introduced by Jesus at the memorial, we show that we are commonly – with one another, sharing in the eating of the flesh of Jesus and drinking of his blood. Thereby we receive the spiritual nutrition essential and indispensable for our salvation.

Although sharing in the sufferings and death of Jesus is clearly taught in the scriptures, Paul is not teaching this here in the communion verse.

“Is it Not”: Indicates a Reminder of Something Already Taught Not Something New

“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 17 For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:16–17).

That the Apostle Paul is bringing to mind something familiar rather than a new teaching [like a secondary meaning] is indicated by his use of the phrase “is it not”, twice in the communion verses.

Technically, “is it not” is a figure of speech referred to as “interrogation”; this occurs when a question is asked without waiting for the answer. There are different forms of interrogation and here it is called “interrogation in negative affirmation“; this occurs when the question is put in the negative, and the answer must be in the affirmative, and very emphatically so – indicating that the point made is or should be known already by those to whom the question is addressed.

Let us look at other instances of use of this figure of speech.

“Therefore, I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing?” (Matthew 6:25).

We find it is used in Matthew 6:25 by Jesus to show that indeed life is more than food and the body more than clothing. The important point to glean here is that the “is not” did not introduce something they did not already know.

“So all bore witness to Him, and marveled at the gracious words which proceeded out of His mouth. And they said, ‘Is this not Joseph’s son?’” (Luke 4:22)

We find another example of this interrogative figure of speech in Luke 4 verse 22.  Because of the gracious words that proceeded out of Jesus’ mouth, the people assumed that he was a sage from a far-off land with new found wisdom, and yet the interrogation in negative affirmation “is not” emphasises the fact that Jesus and his family were well known to them.

Therefore, the use of this “is not” figure of speech suggests that the communion verses are a reminder or an emphasis of something that was clear and known, rather than introducing a new truth.

Partaking of the Memorial Emblems Shows That We are Eating and Drinking at the Table of the Lord.

The memorial truth that the Apostle Paul is reminding us of is that eating of the bread and the drinking of the cup emblems indicates that we are together figuratively partaking of the sacrificed body and shed blood of Jesus – and thereby we are eating and drinking at the table of the Lord.

Sharing in the Sufferings of Jesus an Important Teaching – But Not Shown in Partaking of the Memorial Emblems

Let us be clear that we are not saying that faithful followers of Jesus do not share in his sufferings and death – for this is taught clearly in the word of God. Philippians 3:10 is a case in point:

“that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death…” (Philippians 3:10).

But this is not Paul’s teaching in his reference to our partaking of the memorial emblems in 1 Corinthians 10:16.

Fixing KJV 1 Corinthians 10:17

The Rendering of 1 Corinthians 10:17 in the KJV, NKJV and even the RVIC2016 is faulty.

“For we, though many, are one bread and one body; for we all partake of that one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:17, NKJV).

 104 seeing that we the many are one bread, one body: for we all partake.” (1 Corinthians 10:17, (RVIC2016).

When we read 1 Corinthians 10:17 in the KJV, NKJV and even the RVIC2016, we are left with the thought that by partaking of the bread emblem the followers of Jesus become that bread. Ostensibly this does not seem to make sense, but does seem to give credence to the thought that the Church becomes part of the sacrifice from which it benefits.

1 Corinthians 10:17 should read – seeing that there is one bread, we, who are many, are one body”

The Church is referred to as “one body” but never as “the/one bread.” Only Jesus is referred to as “the bread.”

The more modern translations, including the Diaglott, show that the greater number of modern translators overwhelmingly favour the alternate rendering – seeing that there is one bread, we, who are many, are one body. The“we” belongs with the many and one body, not the bread – for as the verse makes clear we are one body because we partake of that bread.

We Need to Keep Eating at the Table of the Lord in Order to Gain the Imperishable Crown

As followers of Jesus, we need to keep spiritually feeding on his flesh and drink his blood to continue to receive these incredibly gracious benefits during this age of darkness. We remind ourselves of these spiritual benefits flowing from God to us based on Jesus’ shed blood and sacrificed body, particularly at memorial time.

What a privilege it is to eat and drink at the table of the Lord; for it leads to eternal life. But doing so also carries all important responsibilities. We have to avoid all forms of idolatry, particularly the subtle forms, for truly we are on trial for life, now.

“Now the just shall live by faith; But if anyone draws back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” 39 But we are not of those who draw back to perdition, but of those who believe to the saving of the soul(Hebrews 10:38–39).

But if we are careful and listen to God’s word, for Jesus speaks to us through it, we will not be of those that draw back to destruction, but rather we will be of those that are faithful, temperate and disciplined, leading to eternal life – to the glory of our Heavenly Father.

“Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: Thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over” (Psalm 23:5).

Amen.

LUKE 22:17-20 – The Two Cups

MATTHEW 26, 27-29, NASB.jpg

The Two Cups

Introduction

The Memorial is a special time of the year, a time when we refocus on the basis for our Christian existence and hope; by remembering the sacrifice Jesus made for us and thereby reconciled us to God.

On the night he was betrayed, at the beginning of the 14th of Nisan, Jesus instituted the emblems of the bread and wine after the last supper he had with his disciples. He gave us both to partake of, which simply but powerfully reminds us that only in him we have true life through forgiveness of sins.

That each Gospel account gives us additional details of the events, and from a slightly different perspective and approach, suggests that all of the accounts need to be taken together as a whole in order to get the most complete picture of those final moments of our Redeemer’s life. The Apostle Matthew arranges his Gospel more thematically whereas Luke arranges the events more chronologically.

Here we will focus on clarifying what the cup Jesus instituted means.

The Gospel of Matthew Account

Matthew 26:27–29 (ESV) And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, 28 for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. 29 I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.”

In the Matthew account in Chapter 26 verses 27–29, it appears that there is one cup, and that Jesus refers to it both as “my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” in verse 28 and as “this fruit of the vine” in verse 29. If we just take Matthew’s account as the basis for Jesus’ institution of the memorial cup emblem, we might get the impression that not only there was one cup, but that Jesus did drink of this cup – for he says according to the ESV in verse 29 “I will not drink again,” suggesting that he had already drank of it. And some suggest that this therefore shows that the disciples – and by implication all consecrated believers, share with Jesus in his sufferings – after all, like Jesus, we are told to present ourselves a living sacrifice in Romans 12:1.

If Jesus did drink of the memorial cup, what Jesus described as “this fruit of the vine” would seemingly and straightforwardly refer to wine consumed during a supper. The “vine” referring to a grapevine and its fruit as consumed and referred to at the time meant wine, i.e. fermented grape juice – for this was a way of preserving it. Grape juice would of course be an acceptable substitute for those inclined to do so. That Jesus does not refer to the contents according to the normal, commonly used ancient Greek word for wine, oinos, may be significant.

But if the cup was also “my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” – as Jesus states, and if Jesus also drank of it, then we are left with the uncomfortable suggestion that Jesus needed forgiveness of sins provided by his own sacrifice – which of course does not make sense as Jesus was sinless, and no sinner can redeem their own sin.

One solution to this problem seems to be that Jesus did not in fact drink of this cup. And this does seem to be supported by the questionable translation of the Greek preposition “apo” and adverb “arti” in the ESV as “again” in some Bibles. These two ancient Greek words literally mean “from now.” About 10 Bibles translate them as “again”, but at least 15 translate them as “from now” or “henceforth”, and the RVIC2016 as well as Wilson’s Diaglott translate them as “henceforth.” Importantly, the better translations of “henceforth” and “from now” are ambiguous in indicating whether Jesus did in fact drink of the cup or not.

The Gospel of Matthew Account

The Gospel of Mark account is much more succinct in general and here in regards to the institution of the memorial cup, is very similar to Matthew’s.

Luke 1:3 (ESV) “it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus.”

The Gospel of Luke account of these events is however fuller, and as mentioned, Luke the physician, paid particularly attention to the sequence of events, and he states so in Luke 1:3, he says “having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus.” When he addresses the reader as “Theophilus” he means “lover of God”, which is what the word means in ancient Greek. That Luke wrote his account with particular attention to the sequence of events is important for us.

Luke 22:17–20 (ESV) And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, “Take this, and divide it among yourselves. 18 For I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” 19 And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 20 And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.

Luke distinguishes between the cup of “the fruit of the vine” and the cup “that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood,” as partaking of the bread emblem occurred in between.

Two cups:

  • The “fruit of the vine” cup
  • The “new covenant in my blood, for the forgiveness of sins, poured out for you” cup

This is important information, for it tells us that there were, in fact, two cups – not one; firstly, the “fruit of the vine” cup and secondly – combining the Matthew and Luke accounts, of “the new covenant in my blood, for the forgiveness of sins, poured out for you.”

1 Corinthians 11:25 (ESV) In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”

The first cup was seemingly partaken of during the last supper, as the second cup, the memorial cup was instituted by Jesus after supper – as the Apostle Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 11:25.

An important question to ask at this point is, is this important? – one, two cups, what is the difference?

If they are the same cup and if Jesus did partake of it does affect what the cup means, and also what our relationship to Jesus in regards to the cup actually is. As mentioned, some suggest that by drinking of the cup shows that we share in “the sufferings of Christ” with Jesus. So, the implications of whether there are one or two cups is not insignificant.

The “Fruit of the Vine” Cup

If there are two cups, they are different. Does that mean that they signify different things, or anything at all beyond the literal contents of wine?

It seems that that both signify different things.

Both cups literally contained “fruit of the vine” – almost certainly wine. That the 2nd cup, the memorial cup meant more than the literal wine it contained may suggest that Jesus also meant more than the literal wine in the first cup. This seems to be supported by Jesus’ use of the unusual phrase “fruit of the vine” for the wine, as this phrase is only found 3 times in the New Testament and only in the Gospel accounts in relation to the memorial cup. No where else in the Scriptures is the phrase “fruit of the vine” used to refer to wine. The normal word for wine, oinos, is however widely and commonly used in the New Testament, some 34 times.

Luke 7:33–34 (NKJV) For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and you say, ‘He has a demon.’ 34 The Son of Man has come eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Look, a glutton and a winebibber, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’

As an example, in Luke 7:33–34 we have the word oinos used twice in relation to John the Baptist and Jesus when the Pharisees criticized both – John for not eating bread and drinking wine saying he had a demon, and Jesus for eating bread and drinking wine saying he was a glutton and drunkard. If therefore the word for wine, oinos was commonly used, but that Jesus did not use it for the contents of the first cup but instead used the unusual phrase “fruit of the vine” suggests Jesus may have had a deeper meaning in mind.

John 6:48 (ESV) I am the bread of life.

John 15:5 (ESV) I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.

Just as the memorial emblem of the bread that they all ate of indicates that Jesus “is the bread of life” – as Jesus explicitly states in John 6:48, the “fruit of the vine” reference may point to Jesus’ statement in John 15:5 that he is “the vine” and that his disciples are the branches – just as all consecrated Christians are. But if it is not literal, what is the metaphorical “fruit of the vine?” This would seem to be the fruits of the spirit that all those in Christ develop. And the full fruitage of the vine will not be evident till the body of Christ is completed at the end of the harvest period when the kingdom of God is established.

Galatians 5:22–23 (ESV) But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.

Here the “fruit of the vine” therefore seems to refer to the fruits of the holy spirit evident in all true consecrated believers in Jesus – love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. This would be consistent with Jesus’ statement that he would not drink of this 1st cup till the kingdom of God comes, or in other words that the full fruitage of the vine would not be evident till the kingdom.

What does it mean then if Jesus drank of this cup? If Jesus did drink of this cup, because he also received the holy spirit, he would also be a first fruit of the holy spirit – and so appropriately drink of the same cup.

Luke 22:16 (ESV) For I tell you I will not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.”

This would also seem to be consistent with Jesus’ statement that he would not eat of the Passover till it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God. This statement is also somewhat enigmatic and unlikely to be fulfilled literally in the future, but it does show that the antitype of the Passover is also still not fulfilled. When we examine the details of the Passover, we understand that Israel as a nation was a type for the world in general. The Passover ultimately led to the liberation from the Pharaoh and Egypt, but in the antitype, this has not occurred yet – the world in general has not yet been liberated from the Adversary and his kingdom. In the same way, the “fruitage of the vine” will not be completed and will not be able to be drank of by Jesus and his consecrated followers, till the church is complete and the marriage of the Lamb occurs.

The “New Covenant in My blood, for the forgiveness of sins, poured out for you” Cup

What then, does the second cup mean and indicate? This seems more self-explanatory – for Jesus actually tells us. Jesus says that the cup depicts “the new covenant in my blood, poured out for you, for the forgiveness of sins.” Jesus’s words seem plain and straightforward enough. Some have suggested that they do not apply to us [believers in the Gospel Age], and that the new covenant will only be inaugurated in the kingdom period. That Jesus says that his “blood, [is] poured out for you,” seems to unequivocally apply it to his consecrated followers now during the Gospel Age, not the kingdom age. When Jesus says “for you,” he means his disciples, and by extension us consecrated believers also.

1 Corinthians 15:19 (ESV) If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied.

Moreover, that Jesus’ blood provides forgiveness of sins – the prime requirement for reconciliation with God means that if we do not have forgiveness of sins in Christ, then we are still in our sins and most pitiable of men. Let us be clear, if the new covenant, which is the only means by which we can receive forgiveness of sins is not in operation, then how can we be reconciled to God by our faith?

That Jesus did not drink of this 2nd memorial cup, because it is a different cup, makes much better sense – for to partake of it would suggest that he needed forgiveness of sins; which of course he did not – for he was sinless.

That only all of the disciples did drink of this cup, showed that they were the recipients of the benefits of his sacrifice – for the forgiveness of their sins. We note what Jesus said when he gave them [and by extension us] to drink of the cup, he said “Drink of it, all of you” – he did not say let “us” drink of this cup.

Partaking of the cup did not indicate a sharing in the sufferings of Christ. Not that we do not partake in the sufferings of Christ – for the scriptures indicate that we do, but the memorial cup does not indicate this. It indicates that we together have in common that we are all dependent on the sacrifice of Jesus for our reconciliation with God through forgiveness of sins.

The Common Union of the Blood of Christ

1 Corinthians 10:16 (NKJV) The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?

But what about 1 Corinthians 10:16, does this not indicate that we share in the sufferings of Christ, when the apostle Paul says “is not the cup we bless the communion in the blood of Christ?” It has been assumed that the common union in the blood of Christ here is a common union with Jesus, but the context and the grammatical usage here of “koinonia” [translated communion] indicate that the common union is with one another – a common participation of the blood of Jesus showing that we all receive forgiveness of sins through Jesus’ sacrifice.

Here in 1 Corinthians Chapter 10, the Apostle Paul outlines that “the cup we bless” – the memorial cup we ask a blessing for, is not an empty ritual but shows that we are eating at the table of the Lord – we are appropriating the merit of Jesus’ sacrifice to ourselves. And that eating at the table of the Lord is incompatible with eating at the table of demons – which eating of the sacrifices to idols then essentially was. The Apostle warns us to flee from idolatry. There is no suggestion here that we contribute to the food at the table of the Lord. The idolatry we face is much more subtle; it can be the pursuit of wealth, fame, respect, or even a sense of belonging at the expense of the truth but also includes anything that supplants the authority of God’s word.

John 6:54 (NKJV) Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.

Jeremiah 31:33–34 (NKJV) But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: 1) I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 34 2) No more shall every man teach his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for they all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the LORD. For 1) I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.”

Jesus said, whoever drinks of my blood has eternal life…as John 6:54 says.

Faith in Jesus provides us with 1) forgiveness of sins, and thereby reconciliation with God, in order that we may, through baptism, receive of His holy spirit and be developed as new creatures, as 2) the holy spirit teaches us all things of God [rather than any man], even the deep things, and it writes 3) His royal law of agape love on our hearts – these are all functions of the holy spirit through the new covenant as outlined in Jeremiah 31; that we may be born on the spirit plane in the image of Jesus – when we will see the Passover fulfilled, when the fruit of the vine is complete through commonly with one another, partaking of the blood of Jesus shown in the memorial cup Jesus instituted – if we patiently endure to the end.

In Conclusion

In conclusion, it seems then that when Matthew talks about the cup of “the fruit of the vine” and the cup of Jesus’ “blood of the new covenant, for the forgiveness of sins, poured out for you” that they are in fact two separate cups – according to the Gospel of Luke. Jesus may have drank of the former – as the “fruit of the vine” seems to refer to the first fruits of the holy spirit – and which will not be evident till the marriage of the lamb, the seed of blessing is complete. The second cup is separate, a cup that Jesus did not drink of – but of which Jesus said they should all drink of, indicating their, and by extension, our dependence on the sacrifice of Jesus for forgiveness of sins and reconciliation to God. Without it God could not give us of His holy spirit in order to develop us as new creatures and be born on the spirit plane in the likeness of Jesus.

Hallelujah, O what a prospect! Praise be to our Heavenly Father and to His son Jesus.

Suggested Further Reading:

Eating at the Table of the Lord

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROMANS 8, 18 - ad..jpg

Sea-of-Galilee-Mount-of-Beatitudes.jpg

Suggested Further Reading

“Are We Actual Or Reckoned New Creatures?” The Reprints (No. 5325) of the Original Watch Tower and Herald of Christ Second Presence.

“The Ransom.” by Br. David Rice. Faithbuilders Fellowship Journal.
http://www.2043ad.com/journal/2007/02_ma_07.pdf

“Bread and Cup” by Br. James Parkinson. The Herald of Christ’s Kingdom Magazine, March-April 2018.

“Jesus The Name.”
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2017/07/05/jesus-the-name/

“Who Is the World’s Ransom and Why?”
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2016/03/29/who-is-the-worlds-ransom-and-why/?share=press-this&nb=1

“Nehemiah 8:10 — The Joy of the Lord Is Your Strength.”
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2016/12/20/nehemiah-810-the-joy-of-the-lord-is-your-strength/

 

This post’s URL:
https://biblestudentsdaily.com/2018/03/19/matthew-2627-29-drinking-from-christs-one-cup/

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.